← All guestsCenter Stage

Center Stage · Mornings in the Lab

Joseph C. Jenkins

Who should make the decisions?

A slate-roof craftsman and author brings his proposal for direct democracy to a conversation about communication, representation and participation.
Watch full interview on YouTube ↗
2026-10-01 · Episode #3147 · Keith Bilous & Jon AndersenFull conversation

Meet Joseph C. Jenkins

Who should make the decisions?

Joseph C. Jenkins is an author, publisher and slate-roof consultant who began roofing in 1968. He wrote The Slate Roof Bible and founded the Slate Roofing Contractors Association. In this appearance, Keith and Jon explore his writing on direct democracy, how modern communication could change participation, and the questions his proposal raises. The political ideas discussed are Jenkins’s proposals, presented with the hosts’ questions.

Conversation
Center Stage
Hosts
Keith & Jon
Air date
2026-10-01
Why Government Needs Modern Communication illustrated story cover
Illustrative artwork · Approved illustrated artwork

NEW TOOLS. OLD GOVERNMENT.

Why Government Needs Modern Communication

Jenkins compares today’s ability to distribute writing quickly with earlier centuries. He argues that modern communication should influence how government operates. Keith and Jon give him space to explain the proposal; the clip preserves his argument rather than presenting it as established policy.

07:50 · Watch this moment ↗
One Vote Like Everybody Else illustrated story cover
Illustrative artwork · Approved illustrated artwork

ONE PERSON. ONE VOTE.

One Vote Like Everybody Else

Jenkins makes his proposed voting arrangement concrete: a representative would have one vote alongside each constituent. His example of 300,001 votes describes the system he advocates, rather than a system already operating.

26:58 · Watch this moment ↗

More places to begin

A conversation in chapters

Current full-cut coordinates, including the original opener lead-in.

What the conversation brings forward

  • Jenkins connects the ability to communicate at scale with his proposed approach to government.
  • The representative’s single vote is part of his proposal, rather than an account of existing law.
  • The hosts question how leadership and participation would work.
  • His craft and publishing background provide context for the ideas he brings.

The Reel Room

Two moments. Full context.

Recorded highlights. The original vertical frame and airtime text promote the recurring show.

NEW TOOLS. OLD GOVERNMENT.

Why Government Needs Modern Communication

Jenkins compares today’s ability to distribute writing quickly with earlier centuries. He argues that modern communication should influence how government operates. Keith and Jon give him space to explain the proposal; the clip preserves his argument rather than presenting it as established policy.

Watch this moment in the full interview using the link below. Native horizontal and vertical downloads are being prepared.

07:50 · Watch this moment ↗

Video downloads

Native highlight downloads are being prepared.

Story covers · horizontal and vertical

Illustrations depict ideas from the conversation, rather than documented photographs of events.

Optional post · Guest may edit

We changed how we communicate. Why shouldn’t that change how we govern? I can send copies of my writing around the world overnight without charging for them. That wasn’t possible in 1776, 1876 or even 1976. That’s the point I made to Keith and Jon on Mornings in the Lab with Keith, Jon & Friends. We have tools for communicating with large numbers of people in very short periods of time. My argument is that we should use today’s technology to rethink how government operates today. Keith and Jon gave me room to explain the idea and discuss it. This clip is one part of that conversation. What would you want a system like that to get right before you trusted it? Watch the clip below.

ONE PERSON. ONE VOTE.

One Vote Like Everybody Else

Jenkins makes his proposed voting arrangement concrete: a representative would have one vote alongside each constituent. His example of 300,001 votes describes the system he advocates, rather than a system already operating.

Watch this moment in the full interview using the link below. Native horizontal and vertical downloads are being prepared.

26:58 · Watch this moment ↗

Video downloads

Native highlight downloads are being prepared.

Story covers · horizontal and vertical

Illustrations depict ideas from the conversation, rather than documented photographs of events.

Optional post · Guest may edit

What if your representative had one vote—just like you? In my proposal, the representative would have one vote, and so would each person in their constituency. If there were 300,000 constituents, that would mean 300,001 votes. One of those votes would belong to the representative. The principle I’m arguing for is that the people themselves make the decisions. I explained that idea to Keith and Jon on Mornings in the Lab with Keith, Jon & Friends. This is a proposal I’m putting forward for discussion. The clip gives you the core of it in my own words. What question would you ask before deciding whether it could work? Watch the clip below.

The conversation

In their own words

Selected dialogue from the conversation.

“We have to start using our technology of today to operate our government of today”
Joseph C. Jenkins · Excerpt across cues 212–213; punctuation edited for readability.
Source cue 212–213
08:46 · Watch this moment ↗
“But it’s the people who make the decisions, it’s the people who decide.”
Joseph C. Jenkins · Explaining his proposed system.
Source cue 620
27:21 · Watch this moment ↗
“That’s what we need.”
Joseph C. Jenkins · Responding to Jon’s devil’s-advocate questions.
Source cue 827
36:28 · Watch this moment ↗

One appearance. Full context.

Joseph C. Jenkins with Keith and Jon

Center Stage on Mornings in the Lab · Episode #3147 · Aired 2026-10-01. The air date is separate from a video’s upload date.

A slate-roof craftsman and author brings his proposal for direct democracy to a conversation about communication, representation and participation.

Guest’s official website ↗

Questions and answers

A little more context

Who is Joseph C. Jenkins?

Joseph C. Jenkins is an author, publisher and slate-roof consultant who began roofing in 1968. He wrote The Slate Roof Bible and founded the Slate Roofing Contractors Association. In this appearance, Keith and Jon explore his writing on direct democracy, how modern communication could change participation, and the questions his proposal raises. The political ideas discussed are Jenkins’s proposals, presented with the hosts’ questions.

What does this conversation explore?

A slate-roof craftsman and author brings his proposal for direct democracy to a conversation about communication, representation and participation.

When did this appearance air?

2026-10-01, in episode #3147, with Keith Bilous and Jon Andersen.

Are the clips live?

These are recorded highlights. The vertical frame’s LIVE and airtime text promote the recurring show.

What can I download?

The full interview is available as a low-bandwidth review and a 720p download. All four H/V highlight videos and four dedicated H/V story covers are separately downloadable. Approval states remain individual.

Where can I learn more?

Use the guest’s official sources linked beside the biography.

  • Direct democracy
  • Communication
  • Representation
  • Participation
  • Writing
  • Slate roofing

Optional sharing posts

The full appearance

Complete first-person drafts for the guest to edit. Copying does not publish or send a post.

Optional post · Guest may edit

Who should make the decisions: the people, or the people we elect? I joined Keith and Jon on Mornings in the Lab with Keith, Jon & Friends to explain my argument for direct democracy and discuss how modern communication might make a different approach possible. We talked about the role of representatives, who would lead, and what it would take to get people involved. We also talked about my books and some of the background behind my work. The two clips give you part of the argument. The full conversation gives you more of the questions and discussion around it. What would you ask me about this proposal? Watch the full conversation: [insert verified live Center Stage guest-page URL after approval and page QA].

Keep the conversation going

Share the full conversation.

Native full-interview and highlight downloads are being prepared. The full interview is available on YouTube, and the approved story covers are available above.